| This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. |
L0laStarr (Chat Moderator)[]
Oppose: L0laStarr was opposed in the proposal.
I would like to become chat moderator. I'm always trying to get on chat, but the wikia wide problem is affecting my computer and I can only sometimes come on. But if it ever works for my computer, I'll be on. Also, I am usually on chat for long periods of time if I am ever able to get on. A few hours earlier today, there were some trolls on that were spamming the chat, doing stuff like saying that swearing wasn't allowed, and using caps in their messages. I couldn't do anything but watch. I want to help wikia, and these are my reasons. L0laStarr (talk) 23:51, May 9, 2014 (UTC)
Support:
Oppose: We have a 'full house', so to speak, when it comes to chat mods. We really don't need more. There are plenty of users who would do a great job at being chat mod, but being qualified doesn't necessarily mean you need the rights. Fang (Talk) 01:02, May 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: Have to agree with Fang on this one. We have users who have thousands of edits, but that doesn't mean they're going to be promoted. Plus, most of our mods are active pretty much all the time. ~HOAFanguying
- Comment: Jeez can you guys sign your posts please? - Dragonfree97 [talk] 10:36, May 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: People have long forgotten the ways of signing posts. /me blames message walls. Fang (Talk) 10:50, May 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: Fang has a point unfortuantly. We've got plenty, even though you've got a good reason for the rights If we promoted more there would be more moderators than normal users. Also If you're still interested in helping wiki you can still tell other members to not break the rules, being a moderator is no more than just kicking and banning people, nothing special really. BlueeCookie (talk) 14:06, May 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I understand that being chat moderator is not a big deal; just a few extra buttons. And about the full house? Just forget about this request. Nothing more to say. L0laStarr (talk) 16:57, May 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: User:Fang³ is absolutely right. You guys need to sign your posts. 17:21, May 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: I agree with fang ~mango
- Comment: I just said to forget it...L0laStarr (talk) 21:42, May 11, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: You don't need to forget it, if you get sufficient support than you get the rights. Our opinion doesn't overwrite the opinions of others. I just gave a non-biased, legitimate argument that holds value, it doesn't mean I'm right. Fang (Talk) 21:46, May 11, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: ~ I agree with Fang, but you really would make a good mod, though! ;) Catty, the one and only 22:42, May 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: Shows initiative. Why not? RadarMatt (talk) 01:23, May 25, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: Ok. Just vote for me when i ask for promotion. CheeseDragon12 06:02, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: That's not how it works, Cheese. Also, per the rules this request finished two weeks after it was made. Fang (Talk) 22:42, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
CattyKistune (Rollbacker)[]
- Support: CattyKitsune was supported in the proposal.
Hi! CattyKitsune here! I have been a member here for more than 2 weeks, and I would like permission to be a rollbacker! I have made more than 200 edits and I perfectly qualify. I love editing and being on the wiki! So please consider me! Thanks!!! :D ~ Catty, the one and only 22:49, May 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: Catty would be a good rollbacker, and I really think she's qualified for the position. L0laStarr (talk) 01:23, May 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: gonna go ahead and support this yep - Dragonfree97 [talk] 20:24, May 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: We don't really have a need for rollbacks at the moment, but it might be useful in the future. Make sure to only use the rollback ability when it's necessary (e.g: mass vandalism). Fang (Talk) 00:12, May 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: yes. RadarMatt (talk) 07:00, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Of course! I would never vandalize these powers! :) ~ Catty, the one and only 00:20, May 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: That's not quite what I meant. Fang (Talk) 01:07, May 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Well, I won't use them if not necessary, then. Oops. :s ~ Catty, the one and only 00:32, May 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Please stop editing the same comment days after it was posted. People will vote when they want to, no need to make sure it's seen in recent changes. Fang (Talk) 06:04, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Oops. Sorry about that. ~ Catty, the one and only 12:09, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Ok, so it has officially been more than 2 weeks since my request. I currently have reached the 4 point criteria, so does that mean I got the promotion? I'm just wondering. ~ Catty, the one and only 23:14, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
Fluf59001 (Chat Moderator)[]
- Oppose: Fluf59001 was opposed in the proposal.
- Oppose: We have a full house. It's not just bureaucrats that are full, but almost all of the ranks. Most of the mods are active most of the time, too. ღʟᴏʟᴀsᴛᴀʀʀღ ≧^◡^≦ (Talk) 23:15, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Also, I have checked your edit count and it looks like you need more edits. 179 edits on your user page doesn't count, and you only have 26 on actual page editing. Sorry, but I don't think you can apply yet. ღʟᴏʟᴀsᴛᴀʀʀღ ≧^◡^≦ (Talk) 23:20, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: We have many chat moderaters already. I don't see the need for a new one anytime soon. And like L0la said, you do not have enough edits to qualify. ~ [Catty], the one and only🎶🎶🎶 16:52, June 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: You need 200 mainspace edits. Plus, there are a lot of moderators. Mystic The Crosser (talk) 02:56, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: I actually found it pretty funny how you spam edited your user page for edits that aren't even worth anything, and that you also didn't even write anything for your reason for wanting to be a chat moderator. It's like "hi i did sum editz giv me mod plz" Cloud' (talk) 03:37, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: The edits to your user page consisted of you cutting and pasting the same sentence over and over again, which is very pathetic. Only 26, or about 11% of your edits are mainspace edits, while 179, or about 77% of your edits are to your user page (see here). You're being deceptive with your edit count. In addition, we have a surplus of chat mods and it isn't necessary to have everyone in chat a moderator. -- G-Bot
- Oppose: I suppose I should provide a reason, shouldn't I? Supreme Judge of Hell ~ ShadeTempest (Talk/Message Wall) 02:30, December, 2024 (UTC)
HOAFanguying (Autoconfirmed users)[]
- Oppose: Deku_link1 was opposed in the proposal.
On several occasions HOAFanguying has done nothing to stop people using slurs and telling others to kill themselves. These all violate the chat rules and he does nothing about them. He gives certain users a warning and then nothing else even though they continue and kicks other users instantly. HOAFanguying is abusing his power as chat mod.
- Oppose: Absolutely not. Fanguy is one of our best moderators and saying these things is a grave insult against not only him but the wiki himself. I strongly hope that you reconsider your actions in posting this. - Dragonfree97 [talk] 01:03, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: HAHAHA YOU ****ING LITTLE **** FACE KILL MYSELF OH NOOOOO Cloud' (talk) 01:04, July 6, 2014 (UTC) EDIT: I mean, what the dragon said.
- Oppose: HOA has not violated any chat rules. Fang (Talk) 01:04, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Very Strongly Oppose: Supreme Judge of Hell ~ ShadeTempest (Talk/Message Wall) 01:06, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
Minicakes (Chat Moderator)[]
- Support: Minicakes was supported in the proposal.
In my opinion I would be a good Chat Moderator because I've been here since the start of this year. I am very active on chat. As well as I do not get into many fights, I might get into a debate but it does not last longer then a day or two usually. Finally, my last reason I should be a chat moderator is that there aren't many chat moderators only around 4. Please consider Minicakes (talk) 02:09, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: I support. FanArtistL0la≧^◡^≦ 02:15, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support:- There are very few mods here, and you seem like you'd do a good job. KittycatloverOh yeah 02:16, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: I think you'd do great! RadarMatt (talk) 02:23, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: I VOTE FOR MINI! VOTE FOORR MINI! Animail Crossin 7:27 (PAC) July 8,2014
- Support: SUPPORT ! ᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ MʏsᴛɪᴄDᴀʀᴋᴢ9 ᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ MEME (talk) 02:34, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
L0laStarr (Rollbacker)[]
- Oppose: L0laStarr was opposed in the proposal.
Today there was someone on wikia named User:TheCrud479 and he was doing some mass vandalism. I went to one of the pages he edited, noticed the vandalism, and tried to undo it as fast as I can. This has repeated with a few pages, and I would like permission to be a rollbacker as this might happen again. Luckily, as I am typing this right now Robyn has noticed and blocked him. This is an example of some of the pages I've reverted.
- Oppose: Rollback isn't something that is used as often as it used to be. You need bureaucrats so they can make admins. You need admins so they can delete unnecessary content. You need chat mods to watch over wiki chat rooms. You need rollbackers as well, but think how often we have mass vandalism in comparison to how many rollbackers we really need. We have several right now, with the new addition of Catty. Think of it this way - There will always be a need for admins, a need to delete pages and photos, and to kick/ban someone, and quite a few participants for every one of those roles. Having rollback rights isn't a promotion that a lot of people get, since there just isn't a need for a bunch of people to race to see who can rollback someone's vandalism the fastest. You'd make a great rollbacker in the same way you'd make a great mod, but there isn't a need for them. ~HOA (talk) 01:01, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: It really makes my skin itch that you called it 'rollbacker'. It just sounds like someone who spends all day rolling on their back. I wish I had a back... Cloud' (talk) 02:40, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: snapchat your back pls - Dragonfree97 [talk]
- Comment: @Cloud So you don't like the way I say "Rollback"? :P ღʟᴏʟᴀsᴛᴀʀʀღ ≧^◡^≦ (Talk)
- Comment: I would support you all the way, but HOA did make a good point... anyway, please sign your comments/votes. ^ ~ [Catty], the one and only🎶🎶🎶 22:10, June 21, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: lola, srsly, you sound thirsty for a position at this point, uve tried to get cm and rb a few times within a damn month. GIVE IT A REST. and they have enough staff atm. MangoKiwi (talk) 03:27, June 26, 2014 (UTC)OoMango
- Comment: Catty, there's not much point in signing your comments if your signature doesn't include a link. We know that you, CattyKitsune, wrote that comment because you're a regular on chat and this wiki isn't that big. But just as a general rule of thumb it's best to link to your profile; on some wikis this is an actual rule however we're a fairly lax and tight-knit community so we're not going to fuss over it too much. Fang (Talk) 08:06, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: Very few non-sysop rollbacks. I still have my doubts, but I'd be happy to teach you how to use the rights effectively. Just come see me in chat :) Fang (Talk) 04:40, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral:- I don't see the harm in it, but HOA made a good point.KittycatloverOh yeah 01:13, July 8, 2014 (UTC)
Adamstorm64 (Chat Moderator)[]
- Support: Adamstorm64 was supported in the proposal.
Soooooo I'm active and i have 200 edits so I guess I can get a mod now, right..?
Adamstorm64 (talk) 17:30, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: bruh BlueeCookie (talk) 17:33, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Any reasons? FanArtistL0la≧^◡^≦ 17:34, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I've been active for over a year now and every person with 30+ edits gets a mod. That's a good reason. Adamstorm64 (talk) 17:35, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: I guess.... FanArtistL0la≧^◡^≦ 17:36, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: good idea - Dragonfree97 [talk] 17:38, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
HannahCTFxCFTW (Chat Moderator)[]
- Support: HannahCTFxCFTW was supported in the proposal.
I believe Hannah would serve as an excellent mod for the wiki. She has been a member since February, shows the initiative to keep the chat room in order, and has no issue kicking or banning a user if necessary. Please consider promoting Hannah to a chat moderator. Also, someone please edit this a bit to make it an actual section of the page. I'm on mobile, so mind the mess.~HOA (talk) 18:56, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: I made it a section for you. Anyways, I agree that Hannah would be a great mod. KittycatloverOh yeah 19:07, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral: full house Adamstorm64 (talk) 19:12, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: For the reasons HOA listed. Fang (Talk) 19:14, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: Does not qualify. Only has 51 mainspace edits at the time the voting began. Supreme Judge of Hell ~ ShadeTempest (Talk/Message Wall) 19:15, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: implying you guys cared about that when we promoted adam and mini - Dragonfree97 [talk] 19:29, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Although I do believe Hannah deserves Chat Mod, but she doesn't have 200 mainspace edits so we technically can't promote her. G-Bot (talk)
- Support: Hannah has shown great characteristics that I'd love to see in a fellow chatmod. This includes being kind to others, supporting those in need, contributing to stimulating conversations, and being able to reiterate the rules to those who do not follow them. Hannah would be an excellent chatmod, and I believe that she wil serve as a positive influence to other users on chat and the wikia as a whole. Mary (talk)
- Support: Nevermind, we're clearly not paying attention to the requirements. Promoted to chat moderator. ~ G-Bot | Message Wall | Wiki Admin Since July 2012 | 22:39, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
RadarMatt (Chat Moderator)[]
- Support: RadarMatt was supported in the proposal.
I have served for half a year or so I believe and have done a competent job. I am very active and like to learn from my mistakes when they are made apparent to me. I love animal crossing and many of the users that we chat with. Please consider my proposal! RadarMatt (talk) 18:31, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: smelly Cloud' (talk) 18:36, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: In my opinion I don't think you did anything wrong. You did make mistakes but they were either an accident or you looked at the problem the wrong way. But everyone makes mistakes in life. ~ Mini
- Support: As much opposes and enough words that made this slip-up sound like a huge crime. But like what Mini said, everyone makes mistakes, its what makes us human. One more chance perhaps to prove his true apology?
- Oppose: Abuses powers to single out users, does not kick people based on the rules, has caused large arguments on at least 2 separate occasions - Dragonfree97 [talk] 18:52, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: ^ Adamstorm64 (talk) 18:53, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I'd like to address this since it is harder to do in chat. I didn't intend to abuse my powers, but was instead kicking someone who spammed something that I had asked them to stop earlier. As for arguments, I have done what I can to stop them, but instead have had trouble due to lack of cooperation. Chat has been full of arguments lately and it would be unfair to claim that I am the sole cause. Instead of having open communication as to what mistakes I made in order to better myself, I was demoted unfairly. I am merely just asking for the chance to show that I can use the rights effectively. Thank you for considering my perspective. RadarMatt (talk) 19:01, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: You've had and I quote 'half a year or so I believe' to show you can use your powers properly, and evidently you can't. - Dragonfree97 [talk] 19:06, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: You had a chance, dude. You abused your powers and I it saw myself. Sorry... ~ Catty, the one and only ^-^ (Talk) 18:56, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: As a current CMOD, I believe that we not only have a duty to moderate chat and make sure nothing goes out of hand, but we owe EVERY user a fair viewing. By singling out viewers, and not making a conscious effort of treating others equally, said CMOD should not have said rights. We all make mistakes, this is true, but we have to act our age, treat others with respect, and really be aware of our actions. I mean, believe it or not, users do look up to us and I believe that we should be a good role model. Marii5962 (talk)
- Oppose: You hurt me, told me every time i went on chat that you were tired of me, you were rude to my cousin, and you hardly even USE your powers. You have banned 11 people since getting the job. And come on, you just got demoted TODAY. God. MangoKiwi (talk) 22:19, June 29, 2014 (UTC)OoMango
- Comment: I just wanted to apologize to everyone for letting them down. I'm not sure if this is the right place to do it, but I will try my best to better myself in the future despite having cmod rights or not.RadarMatt (talk) 19:17, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Could someone please fill me in what has happened? Fang (Talk) 22:46, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: I looked through the revision history of this page and saw no demotion request for Matt. Ironic that you should all be shouting "power abuse" when you haven't seeked any form of consent and have just demoted him because that's what you saw was right. I doubt any one-off occasion warrants a demotion either; in the almost year that Matt has been with us I haven't seen any instances of power abuse so why should this one little instance should mean the end of his chat mod rights.
I have warned you all before, if you cannot put your acts together I will temporarily disable chat. Fang (Talk) 22:59, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: 5.3 Abusing your rights as Chat Moderator will result in a demotion and possible ban from the Animal Crossing Wiki. As far as I'm concerned straight up abuse warrants immediate action. Action was taken. - Dragonfree97 [talk] 11:09, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Judging by the fact that two active admins don't seem to agree with this action, don't you think that it may have been a better idea to do things the way fang suggested instead of decision making on your own? RadarMatt (talk) 16:19, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: do you really think i didn't ask a large number of people about doing this before i did it - Dragonfree97 [talk] 16:55, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm not going to continue to argue on this request, but my point still stands: two active sysops disagree with your actions. RadarMatt (talk) 16:58, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: and surprisingly enough two active sysops agree with my actions - Dragonfree97 [talk] 17:41, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: To be honest, the only admins I regularly see on chat that could vouch for me are Lightning and Fang RadarMatt (talk) 17:47, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral: /
- Comment: Admittedly I don't use the chatroom much so I can't fairly give a vote pointing in any direction. However, Matt doesn't seem to have any warnings on his Message Wall or anything like that, maybe it'd be a better idea to let him know that he needs to make improvements to his behaviour/attitude and give him a chance to do that first before removing his rights? Apologies if I have misunderstood and he has in fact been warned somewhere. --Callofduty4 (talk) 18:00, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I have not been warned. RadarMatt (talk) 18:06, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Then removing your rights seems a little bit of a brash decision. I think you should be given a chance first.. --Callofduty4 (talk) 20:56, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: He WAS given multiple chances (I'm pretty sure). But Matt, Robyn removed your rights for a reason, and I think it would've been better if you had just waited a little while before trying to re-apply for your position. Also, why is chat moderator such a big deal? I mean, if you were an admin then that would be another story, but you're not. The results of you re-promotion are looking kind of shaky right now, so if you want a better chance of being re-promoted, then you need to try and gain your opposers' trusts back. Apologies aren't here to save you at the moment, btw. ~ Catty, the one and only ^-^ (Talk) 22:57, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I wasn't given multiple chances, I think the fact that you know so little about the situation shows that... well... you know very little about the situation.RadarMatt (talk) 07:46, July 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Catty, if chat moderator isn't such a big deal then why not let Matt keep the rights? If it's not such a big deal, why has there been so much commotion about a small kick? Fang (Talk) 08:44, July 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: ^ ~Mini ^-^
- Support: -~Space~-
- Comment: If he only kicked once, and only ones, it isn't abuse. A kick is a kick. If it were a ban, on the other hand... -ahem- Anyways, it was unfair to not let him explain. Give him his moderator status back, already. -~Space~-
- Oppose: Sorry but I'm going to have to oppose, you've just had some pretty deep drama going around and arguments. It's too early for you to already be putting yourself up to mod considering i'm fairly sure most people aren't too comfortable about what's been happening; I don't think the community is too happy for what you've done. BlueeCookie (talk) 19:28, July 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: I think there's a misunderstanding here. This, in my opinion, is partially a rebuttal to my rights being taken in the first place because I was not given a fair demotion vote or any ability to dispute my demotion. I was not even warned during my "chances". If I were to wait a certain amount of time then people likely would have forgotten or became apathetic to what has happened. I don't even really know where I can dispute my demotion. I think that if I were to leave a message on the bureaucrat who did it's wall then my thread would likely be locked before I can even say anything or defend myself. As I was told in chat, I have no side, opinion or ability to dispute an arbitrary and unwarned action. I've also talked to many people that are afraid to weigh in on this because of the fact that action may be taken against them as well. RadarMatt (talk) 19:39, July 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: I've done plenty of thinking about this and am deciding to put in my two cents. I, as a mod, am struggling to keep the chat in line. Within a few hours, we've had several users making alts, spamming/advertising links in our chat, and being unfair to one another. We are currently at a minimal amount of mods for such a large chat community. Kieran and myself were the only 2 mods in the chat at the time, though Kieran was away. I was struggling to kick several users at once, potentially ban them, find out where they were from, and end the argument on my own. If Matt had chat moderator rights, he could have helped me. As we all know, there has been plenty of drama in these parts lately where Matt has been blamed for some, if not all. Whether he started it or got in the middle of it, it's ridiculous. This is cliche, but everyone (to a certain extent) deserves a second chance. I have heard from Matt that he wishes to be like the mod he once was when he was first promoted back in February. With a second chance, this can be made possible. He will be able to regain the trust of other users and show that he can handle a situation in the chat room (which really has already been done). The first step in ending the drama that is going on around this wiki is to get a solution on this issue. Don't you wish you had a magic remote that could rewind to a few months back? Well, we don't have one, but we have the ability to recreate the past- the good past. ~HOA (talk) 23:36, July 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment:By the way, I'd just like to say that since there were 4 votes in any direction here, there are July 13 2014 19:10:00 UTC left until the voting ends. Supreme Judge of Hell ~ ShadeTempest (Talk/Message Wall)
- Comment: I'm not voting because I didn't witness Matt abusing his mod rights, but it's clear that it occurred. I would also like to state that Matt has been very friendly and easygoing in my experience with him, and it surprises me to see that this is unfolding. G-Bot (talk)
- Comment: even though some people have been telling me to vote, i have decided to not to,since i have not seen Matt abusing his mod rights,as G-bot has stated. Even though i do believe in second chances, i also don't want drama to buzz in again. so i will have to leave it up to the voters! ~(kii saegusa,pair.Yammy) OtomeRainbow (talk) 04:33, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral: I haven't seen Matt abusing powers, so I could personally go either way. KittycatloverOh yeah 01:21, July 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: Agreed with mini, we're not perfect. We all make mistakes. FanArtistL0la≧^◡^≦01:39, July 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: "Everybody makes mistakes" Hannah Montana, Matt should join because nobody is perfect give this user a chance because Matt has done his duties and made a mistake "forget and forgive" Animail Crossin 6:52 (PAC) July 8,2014
- Comment: LOL people if you got demoted for a stupid reason then you will be like Matt right now BUT when I sign up for admin or chat mod in late 2015/early 2016 I will learn Matt's mistakes BUT MATT did GET demoted for a stupid cowardly reason and THAT makes ME upset gees... X( Animail Crossin 7:21 (PAC) July 8,2014
- Support: I support Matt. ᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ MʏsᴛɪᴄDᴀʀᴋᴢ9 ᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ MEME (talk) 02:39, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: MarioYoshi101 (talk) 02:49, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Well matt, if things keep going like this for the next few days you might be promoted back to CMod, I guess. 6 opposes and 11 supports. FanArtistL0la≧^◡^≦ 02:54, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: I originally commented and said I wouldn't be voting because I didn't witness what occurred, but I've been informed exactly what happened and know that many of you who opposed didn't witness it either, so I now support Matt's promotion. We all make mistakes, and hopefully we can all learn from them and they won't be repeated. G-Bot (talk)
- Neutral: He hasn't really done anything to make me support or not support him, so I'm gonna say neutral. This has been chillv signing out. (talk) 06:48, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: I think Matt should be promoted once again. He has served the wiki since this February and has shown the ability to handle the chat. If I recall correctly, he was demoted for abusing his rights as a mod. I was not there to see it happen, but I believe everyone deserves second chances. I know if Matt is promoted once again he will demonstrate how well he is at being a chat moderator for the wiki. HannahCTFxCFTW (talk) 21:08, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
Wolf-gangs (Administrator)[]
- Support: Wolf-gangs was supported in the proposal.
I have been in this wiki since 2012. I'm working on cleaning up the characters and events pages. I introduced to this wiki a new gallery style, that can be found now. Well, in terms of edits, I mostly upload high quality images. Other than that, I didn't do anything great KP. Anyway, I believe I'm experienced enough, as I have been an admin and bureaucrat in other wikis for like 2-3 years and have a normal skills in editing. I seek for improving this wiki and I'm currently working on cleaning few things that Dragonfree is aware of. Thank you, Wolf-gangs (talk) 18:02, July 5, 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral: L0laStarr ≧^◡^≦ 13:12, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: KittycatloverOh yeah 19:41, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: good community member for a long time - Dragonfree97 [talk] 11:15, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: Changing my vote. Has contributed many, many important things to this wiki that I overlooked before. May not be super active, but is making a comeback. Has done well for us in the past, and shows the ability to be an admin, as seen on other wikis. ~HOA (talk) 17:23, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral: I probably already made my vote, but I'm going to have to change it to neutral. On one hand, I feel like you would be a great admin, but on the other hand I agree with HOA. L0laStarr ≧^◡^≦ 18:36, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: You are definitely experienced enough, but we don't hand out rights on the basis of knowing how to use them. Fang (Talk) 21:21, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral: You are one of my good friends that I've known for a while and you just got back to this Wiki. You provide a lot help too but we've just promoted another adminstrator a while ago. So it'd just be best to give it some time due to the fact that we've got enough administrators and bureaucrats at the moment. - ╚»★«╝ℓιgнтηιηgЧЭ╚»★«╝ 15:15, July 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: It's been long enough! Animail Crossin 7:25 (PAC) July 8,2014
- Comment: animail type ~~~~ for ur sig - Dragonfree97 [talk] 20:28, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: OH JUST BE AN ADMIN ALREADY Cloud' (talk) 19:50, July 11, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: HannahCTFxCFTW (talk) 21:41, July 11, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: ᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ MʏsᴛɪᴄDᴀʀᴋᴢ9 ᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ MEME (talk) 19:00, July 12, 2014 (UTC)
Roy G Biv (Autoconfirmed users)[]
- Support: G-Bot was supported in the proposal.
Roy G Biv is a chat moderator with three edits. We have an overabundance of chat moderators, and he is extremely unqualified. ~ G-Bot | Message Wall | Wiki Admin Since July 2012 | 22:06, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: I support. Along with that, I rarely see him on chat. FanArtistL0la≧^◡^≦ 22:37, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Honestly, he didn't even met this wiki requirements to become a chat moderator. Why a vote is necessary? He must be removed without any votes! There are times when votes are needed, but in this case there is no need, admins must simply remove the chat moderators right from him. Wolf-gangs (talk) 22:58, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Per the promotion rules, sysops do not need to follow the normal promotion standards when giving a user chat mod rights. As someone who is applying for sysop rights, it's important for you to understand this. Fang (Talk) 23:03, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: If we're basing these demotions off activity, we may as well demote G-Bot himself, Taliseth, MerrytonRyan and half of our staff. Roy B Giv is the second account of User:DelibirdSanta2012. Also, please tell me why he is underqualified? Fang (Talk) 23:15, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral: Though for most of us summer holidays have been going on for almost a month or maybe more, it is possible that Roy G Biv has found conflict with schedueling and is unable to make it to chat as often as we would like. On the other hand, if he's busy during the school year, AND can't find time during the summer to help the wikia out, then I do support the consideration of demoting Roy G Biv. For now, I'm staying neutal for the chance that he comes back and turns this situation on its head. As an added note, it would be nice if he continued to further his contributions to the wikia as a whole-- both in terms of Main Edits and modding chat. Best of luck. Mary (talk)
- Comment: js: http://prntscr.com/4151qa Fang (Talk) 00:06, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: can confirm, deli was a thing in like juuuly? august? He had enough edits for a mod. If you guys forgot your password, would you rather make 200 more edits (or 30 these days) or just ask a bcrat to mod you again? Adamstorm64 (talk) 00:20, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: @fang this is why we need to lock this page - Dragonfree97 [talk] 09:01, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: Idk, I think just locking the user rights (like how b'crat is) is better. Demotion requests need to still be open for any genuine demotions. Fang (Talk) 09:13, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: I support this, mainly because we should start to stop demoting millions of people who are never going to be active in the first place instead of finding good active users who have the correct requirements, deli is my friend and all but that's not a reason to keep my mouth shut, BlueeCookie (talk) 15:14, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: inactive and slightly rude Annoyinq (talk) 23:30, July 10, 2014 (UTC)Annoyinq
- Support: Nothing personal Supreme Judge of Hell ~ ShadeTempest (Talk/Message Wall) 19:14, July 12, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: - Lightning43
ShadeTempest (Patroller)[]
- Support: ShadeTempest was supported in the proposal.
I would like to request patroller rights, as it is not on the locked rights and is available. And also since I stalk the recent changes a lot, this would be a useful way to check off the ones that have already been looked at. Supreme Judge of Hell ~ ShadeTempest (Talk/Message Wall) 23:15, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: ye shade crazy stalks s:rc even more than I do - Dragonfree97 [talk] 23:16, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: Full support, you deserve rights around here with your amount of edits, responsibility, and capability to watch Recent Changes with the eye of a hawk. Best of luck! ~HOA (talk) 23:18, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: No.. Shade has done nothing but terrorize the whole Wikia from the start he came back from his long hiatus. On the chat he rips out the souls of friendly users and is the opposite of a funny and nice person. He lacks the maturity and the responsibility for this role. Wait, we're all supporting him? Well then, ignore all of what I said , and replace it with the opposite that is being said (he actually does the opposite of these things 83) - ╚»★«╝ℓιgнтηιηgЧЭ╚»★«╝ (talk) 23:48, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: MysticDarkz9 ~ (Message Wall) 23:58, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Support: yes ~
L0laStarr (talk)20:18, September 3, 2014 (UTC) - Support: Emolga-girl ~ (Message Wall) 22:34, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: September 15 2014 23:15:00 UTC countdown so HOA doesn't have to continually calculate after stalking the page
RadarMatt (Autoconfirmed users)[]
- Support: ShadeTempest was supported in the proposal.
- He has become very inactive.
- Abuses powers. One ordinary user said "this user is undesirable", referring to RadarMatt. Another completely different user stated that he has kicked people for doing things that are not against the rules.
- He has previously been demoted and currently displays absolutely no intention to be a better moderator since his re-promotion. He has had over 6 months to bring up his reputation and has failed to do so.
- His behavior and attitude targeted toward specific users is terrible both on and off the wiki.
- He often believes he is better than other users, and has used very colorful language to all users.
- The chat community does not feel safe with him around, and certainly does not feel safe with his ability to kick/ban users.
Supreme Judge of Hell ~ ShadeTempest (Talk/Message Wall) 18:37, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: agree ∼MysticDarkz9 ~ (Message Wall) 19:46, February 16, 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: I think the only thing I can agree with you partially is my current inactivity. As for all your other points I find they lack proof and most are hearsay at best. For example: I haven't abused my powers since my most recent promotion. If you want to talk about any issues you have with me personally I am open to discuss them. It would probably just be good to leave a message on my message wall to make an appointment with me or something or to add me on my skype "radar.matt". Thanks RadarMatt (talk) 05:18, February 19, 2015 (UTC)
HOAFanguying (Administrator)[]
- Support: HOAFanguying was supported in the proposal.
Alright, two shakes.
I've been a user since June 2013 and a chat moderator since February 2014. I think I've gained everyone's trust over the past couple of years. I have nearly 2,000 edits and display the ability to not only edit mainspace, but work with templates, and have self-taught myself how to edit in source. And may I say, I think I've gotten quite good at it. I've managed to update some things around here like this and like this and all these. I'm an admin on the Tomodachi Wiki and have shown the qualities of a good administrator over there. With my experience here the past two years, I can pretty much answer any question you may have and often times help new users when they first enter the chatroom. As an admin, not only will I continue to do the work I have been doing since I've been here, but will have access to locked pages which will be useful when no other admins are around, and the ability to block users, which also would come in handy when users are vandalizing and all I can do is undo their edits until someone comes around.
I hope y'all will consider me for an admin. :) ~HOA (talk) 23:55, April 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: oh well - Dragonfree97 [talk] 10:16, April 2, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: Yeah on second thought I might forget to change this later and HOA deserves my vote. SSB Champion Prat (talk) 21:04, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: Yes. ∼MysticDarkz9 ~ (Message Wall) 03:35, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: I do agree that HOA should be a admin because, 1. He has taught many users about how to use the source editor as well (me being one of the many users), 2. He has answered many questions about editing pages that users have given him (me being one of those users) and (as I have seen) knows a lot about the Animal Crossing franchise 3. He is already a awesome chat moderator and I think he could contribute more to the wiki if he were to be a admin. I do hope that HOA will become a great admim. ~Emilysara 20:41, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: this is a library, and fang is a tooth -hoa. NeikoTheLucario 22:09, April 4, 2015 (EST)
- Support: A great user who has taught himself how to edit source. Ellis99 CODE XANA 17:04, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
Emolga-girl (Rollback and Patroller)[]
- Support: Emolga-girl was supported in the proposal.
Emolga has been an active editor since 2012 and currently has over 2,000 edits. She has made excellent edits over the years. Also, she is aware of how to use Recent Changes and has displayed knowledge of fixing/undoing edits, especially in the event of vandalism. ~HOA (talk) 20:56, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: Emolga has a ton of valuable edits, and the promotion is something she has earned. SSB Champion Prat (talk) 21:02, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: ^^^I agree with Prat! ~Emilysara 22:32, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: ∼MysticDarkz9 ~ (Message Wall) 03:35, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: User:Emolga-girl is a very reliable editor. Supreme Judge of Hell ~ ShadeTempest (Talk/Message Wall) 02:20, April 5, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: as above - Dragonfree97 [talk] 01:14, April 13, 2015 (UTC)
Emilysara (Rollback and Patroller)[]
- Support: Emilysara was supported in the proposal.
For similar reasons listed above. Emily has displayed excellent knowledge of using Recent Changes and has made minor, very useful edits since August of 2014 including fixing/undoing vandalism. I have worked with her before and am teaching her how to use source editor, as she is eager to learn. ~HOA (talk) 20:56, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: Emily is a valuable asset to the wiki, even if her Smash 4 game is weak. SSB Champion Prat (talk) 20:59, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: Not only is Emily a good friend of mine, but she is very polite and easily trusted. dishsoapp (talk) 21:47, April 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: ∼MysticDarkz9 ~ (Message Wall) 02:07, April 5, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: emily is kewler thn Robyn (putting this before robyn's comment so it chronologically looks like she's agreeing with me because nobody pays attention to the dates) Supreme Judge of Hell ~ ShadeTempest (Talk/Message Wall) 02:07, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: as above - Dragonfree97 [talk] 01:14, April 13, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: Great user, just like her work. Ellis99 CODE XANA 17:04, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
Kiyotaka (Autoconfirmed users)[]
- Support: YmPrat was supported in the proposal.
Me and Leo get along pretty well so it pains me to put forth a motion for their demotion, but they have abused their powers as a mod. Leo has kicked Emily a number of times purely for entertainment. In addition Kiyotaka has unbanned a known alt account.
- Support: SSB Champion Prat (talk) 03:47, April 10, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: Looking at what you have said, users like that shouldn't have powers. Ellis99 CODE XANA 10:15, April 13, 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral: I can't say that I want him demoted nor can I say I don't want him to be demoted. Kiyo is a cool guy and him kicking me was for fun. That day he kicked me twice is that he wanted to kick me. He didn't kick me without my permission, he kicked me because I allowed it (just for the laughs). If he is purely going to be demoted because of me I will have to oppose since I allowed him to kick me. That day was just for the laughs (It was April Fools too). ~Emilysara 04:15, April 10, 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: "abusing powers" I haven't abused my powers once. The only time I haven't used my powers seriously is when I have full-on consent from the other party. All of my bans were only used towards people who deserved the ban, and I rarely kick outside of actual need for it. If you think I'm abusing my powers, then you obviously have no idea what abuse is. Kiyotaka (talk) 00:02, April 13, 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: can you lot sign your damn posts? I've got no idea who's saying what - Dragonfree97 [talk] 23:09, April 12, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: - Hayden (talk) 20:53, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
Adamstorm64 (Autoconfirmed users)[]
- Support: HOAFanguying was supported in the proposal.
Adam was promoted during July 2014 which if everyone remembers correctly was a horrible time in the wiki's history. He was promoted in a quick attempt to reach an agreed on "maximum limit" of active moderators so promotions could be locked down. Adam was filled in this spot as everyone rushed to support him so no one else could write a proposal. His reasons for wanting the rights are, quoted, "I've been active for over a year now and every person with 30+ edits gets a mod."
Since his promotion, Adam has shown no signs of wanting to keep his powers and has stated, "I don't even use my mod." Before his promotion, Adam was banned on multiple occasions. During his time as a mod, his attitude has not matured and does not come off as someone who is willing to help users in the chat.
Adam lacks in using his powers, is hardly in the chat to be modding, has been disrespectful, and has shown signs of happiness when new users leave the chat, likely to never visit again. He does not seem to care about his rights and should not have them in his possession if he doesn't plan to use them or be around enough to help out.
нσα (тαℓк) 00:23, August 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Neutral: (Pictures) I have compromised pictures relating to chat on August 15, 2015. It has content from the chat when Adam joined chat at 7:41 pm (EST) and when he left chat at 8:01 pm (EST).Demotion is a very serious matter and either side can use the information I have collected.
~Emilysara (Questions?) 00:50, August 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: I agree with HOA. I hardly see Adam around, and if you are disrespectful to others, I don't think you should have moderator rights. Having rights at all is a privilege. If you aren't going to use them, OR not be active enough to use them, then I don't think you should have them. Emolga-girl ~ (Leave a message!) 22:43, August 15, 2015 (UTC)
Stormcloudz (Autoconfirmed users)[]
- Support: Emolga-girl was supported in the proposal.
- Kieran has changed his username and account an extreme amount of times which often leads users to not know who he is or confuses them as to why a "new user" has been given mod rights.
- He has been in several situations where he will make an alt for fun and use it to annoy other users. When the alt is banned, he is quick to unban it time after time again until eventually consequences are given to his main account. Note that being on the chat at the same time as your alt is already against the rules and that this is also a severe incident of abusing rights.
- He has become relatively inactive.
- He has not done a very well job of being a mod in general recently. Kieran does not seem to meet any form of quality that is desired in a mod. Due to breaking rules, abusing rights, and being inactive, I see it best that he is demoted from his chat moderator position.
Emolga-girl ~ (Leave a message!) 03:20, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: silly emolga Stormcloudz (talk)
- Support: I agree for the reasons stated above. S t a t i c THE sbnᴉɹɹǝl | Talk 03:58, January 25, 2016 (UTC)
- Support: I agree. User:MeltedSpheres
- Support: I agree. His "jokes" are rarely funny and offensive in certain situations. I feel like he's not very mature enough to be a mod. User:CalimariAquariium
- Oppose: For a long time stormcloudz/the user behind it has been an active member of this wikia and has contributed to its growth. The changing of usernames and the occasional crude comments are something that I believe can be solved. Alternatively, the wikia is suppose to be a fun and inclusive place where people of all ages and senses of humor can come together. That means that there will be differences between all of us and I don't think one should be scrutinized for it. In terms of inactiveness, this is a website and I personally think we shouldn't punish someone for not being able to dedicate as much as time as they may like to or use to. From personal experience, I would love to contribute more to the site but unfortunately can't very much due to my heavy course load at university. If that's going to be one of the deciding factors for demotion, then i personally think that's unfair because sometimes it's not in our hands. User:Marii5962
ShadeTempest (Administrator)[]
- Support: ShadeTempest was supported in the proposal.
Hey, it's me, ShadeTempest. I've been on this wiki for some years, and I've done some things, and I think it's about that time. Let me know what you think. Supreme Judge of Hell ~ ShadeTempest (Talk/Message Wall) 00:46, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
Neutral While you certainly would be a good admin, I don't think rights should be handed out purely on the basis of competency. If you believe that the wiki would benefit with you having these rights, you should specify how in your promotion request rather than just leaving it at "I think it's about that time". Fang³ 08:13, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
- Support: Extremely competent user with full knowledge of the wiki and how it works. Would be an excellent asset to the team - Dragonfree97 [talk] 12:35, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Putting you in a position of administrative power makes me wonder how willing you are to compromise with the other admins when differences of opinions arise. I don't know if that's something you possess. However, I do not want to oppose this because certainly you know everything there is to know. And along with what Fang has said, you have even accused people in the past of putting up proposals just for the sake of wanting rights. нσα (тαℓк) 14:27, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't think it necessarily matters whether a proposal is made simply for the sake of 'getting rights'; if the user in question is sufficiently competent and capable, as I'm sure you all agree Shade is, then administrative tools surely just serve as an extension of their capabilities rather than an end goal or aspiration to reach - Dragonfree97 [talk] 14:38, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Well, if I'm to be completely honest, I wanted to become admin to fix those little mistakes in locked pages without bothering Robyn or another admin about it every single time. I really didn't know what to put in the proposal so I just left a vague statement like that. Perhaps I should've written a more thought out proposal. Well, even if this fails I can still continue asking admins to fix mistakes so it's fine. Supreme Judge of Hell ~ ShadeTempest (Talk/Message Wall) 17:13, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I see what you mean, and that is a valid reason. I'll keep thinking on it, but as of right now you are 100% supported, so well done! нσα (тαℓк) 17:32, May 1, 2016 (UTC)
- Comment:
I have no doubt that the wiki would benefit having Shade as an administrator, I think we have like a 100% track record with agreeing on things and I consider him the user I'm closest to on the wiki. The problem is that the active community that is involved with making all the changes to staff and how the wiki is operated are all friends, but we are not the only editors impacted by the changes we make. We have plenty of infrequent editors who don't participate in the social aspect of the wiki but contribute to the wiki all the same. Like, from the perspective of relatively unknown but active editor, Shade doesn't meet the mainspace edit requirement, the position for administrator isn't even open and the only voters are other administrators. None of this matters of course because Shade genuinely deserves these rights, but for the sake of the unlikely situation in which someone else wants to contribute to changes made to the wiki the proposal should be valid and formal. Fang³ 08:44, May 2, 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: the above comment took me like half an hour to write and didn't conclude anything I was actually trying to say. Sorry I think I was tired or not in the right mind frame. The tl;dr of what I was trying to say: Formatting your proposal so that you allow yourself to be critiqued results in disagreements being a lot less personal. In the past I've felt pressured to support things I didn't want to support because stating my reasons for opposing something made it seem like I had a personal grudge against someone, when I didn't. Even dot points are fine, so long as you just give yourself room to discuss pros and cons without creating tension. Fang³ 02:30, May 3, 2016 (UTC)
- Support: Experienced, understands administrator responsibilities, very objective when handling things. Fang³ 08:50, May 2, 2016 (UTC)
- Support: I mean, the only reason it says you can't apply for rights is because it scares everyone away and because of what happened in July of two years ago. Also, are the edit requirements even a thing? I thought we also used those to scare people away. And Fang, I'm a little hurt that you say you're closer to Shade than MYSELF? Kidding. I'm too busy to care. Anyway, support. нσα (тαℓк) 20:23, May 2, 2016 (UTC)
- Support: Very smart and knows quite a lot about the wiki. S t a t i c THE sbnᴉɹɹǝl | Talk 01:27, May 14, 2016 (UTC)
HOAFanguying (Bureaucrat)[]
- Comment: The proposal was archived early per user request.
HOA has been an active user on this wiki since 2013, and an administrator for a little over a year. He is one of the most active editors on the wiki. He is experienced with the tools on this wiki. On top of his experience, he is one of our most friendly users. He's willing to help anyone who needs help, he's easy to get along with, and he knows how to use his powers for the good of the wiki. I believe that HOA has earned a bureaucrat position because of how much he has contributed to the wiki since he joined, and how much he has proven that he knows how to use his powers responsibly.
Before anyone says that there isn't a position open right now, Shade was given an administrator position despite there not being one open not too long ago.
Emolga-girl ~ (Leave a message!) 01:36, May 22, 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose: When will people stop treating user rights like scouts badges? I don't think we need additional bureaucrats. Fang³ 04:10, May 22, 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose: Pretty sure Fanguy himself says he doesn't want the role - Dragonfree97 [talk] 10:35, May 22, 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I really appreciate the gesture. However, I think it is best that I receive bureaucratic rights at a time in need. Robyn, Fang, and Seth are all currently active, and as Robyn has stated, she has asked me if I wanted to be a bureaucrat twice and I have denied her both times. Maybe one day, but just not today! :) нσα (тαℓк) 15:35, May 22, 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I didn't realize that HOA himself said he didn't want the role. If he doesn't want the role, then I see no reason in keeping this open now. If anyone wants to archive this early, that would be fine. Emolga-girl ~ (Leave a message!) 22:45, May 23, 2016 (UTC)
Lightning43 (Autoconfirmed users)[]
- Support: Static the Squirrel was supported in the proposal.
This does not feel good to say, but I believe that it's for the best that Light is demoted. Recently, Light has been kind of a prick to say the least, especially in the chatroom. For example, he has repeatedly abused the slur filter just for fun. He is also not keeping up to date on the latest wiki-related news (such as the Amiibo templates getting finished, etc.). On top of this, he hasn't exactly been the best editor recently either, as you can see here. Light seems to only visit the wiki for his personal endeavors and to just mess around on chat, and hasn't been doing much good for the community as a whole. I do not think this kind of a user deserves to be an administrator on here, as he is clearly incapable of actually doing his job. S t a t i c THE sbnᴉɹɹǝl | Talk 20:57, July 15, 2016 (UTC)
- JawshLuvsYa01's vote was removed due to insufficient mainspace edits at the start of polling
- Support: Kiasne (talk) 21:00, July 15, 2016 (UTC)
- Support: All reasons stated above. MoonMatterTalk 21:00, July 15, 2016 (UTC)
- Support: Ninja111111 (talk) 01:14, July 16, 2016 (UTC)
- Support: Sbd01 (talk) 04:44, July 16, 2016 (UTC)
- Support: ∼Ðarkz ~ (Talk) <acronym title="SourPls">https://i.imgur.com/8hIznjd.gif</acronym> 05:00, July 16, 2016 (UTC)
- Support: MeltedSpheres (talk) 04:57, July 18, 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose: He was a bit slow when we were trying to tell him that we've finished the amiibo cards, but I don't think he was trying to deliberatley annoy us, he hadn't been around for a while after all. In the long term, light has done good for the community, I think that you shouldn't be too quick to judge and should have waited to see if his behaviour continues rather than assuming he's a bad administrator because of a couple slip-ups honestly. About the slur abuse, as far as I know of static made braeden an exception to test out the slur filter so I'm not all too sure what this is about. BlueeCookie (talk) 08:42, July 16, 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm not going to interfere with too much of this, because after all everyone gets a say in this. All that I have to say is for the new users, I didn't create much of a good image of myself, especially when coming back to the Wiki a couple of times. I know for a fact that I can be mischievous in the chat room, perhaps at times where the envelope may have been pushed too much, I never intend to create bad relationships with others as I enjoyed being here for the past few years. As for the edits, I wasn't aware of the new additions such as the Amiibo cards, including the times when editing them. When it comes to editing, we are trying to clean up pages, so removing up awkward wording and poor quality pictures is what I have been doing lately. So, carry on with this request, as I just wanted to shed my thoughts on the subject, thank you. ╚»★«╝ℓιgнтηιηgЧЭ╚»★«╝ (talk) 14:02, July 17, 2016
- Oppose: - Hayden (talk) 22:24, July 19, 2016 (UTC)