Animal Crossing Wiki
Advertisement

Rules and information

Archives
Replacement filing cabinet

[ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]

Procedure and rules for all votes:

  • You must have 10 or more mainspace edits before the start of polling.
    • An exception for discussions moderator proposals: You must have 10 discussion posts before the start of the polling. Furthermore, you must be part of the wiki's discussions for at least one week. You must fulfill both of these requirements or the "10 mainspace" requirement.
  • You may either
Support Support:
Oppose Oppose:
Comment Comment: on an issue.
  • All proposals will run for one week unless discussion has not stopped after that time, in which case it may be extended at the discretion of an administrator.
  • All proposals require at least 2/3 supporting votes in order to pass.
  • When starting a poll thread, you are entitled to link it around the wiki on message walls of those who may be concerned. Abuse of this privilege will result in the proposal being disqualified and archived early.
  • Sign all proposals and comments with four tildes. Please remember to timestamp your proposals.

Additional information for user rights requests

  • A user who is being promoted or demoted may request that a thread regarding them is closed. In this event:
    • Promotion: user does not receive rights.
    • Demotion: user is automatically demoted.
  • Bureaucrats who witness abuse of rights may demote a user without a formal proposal.
  • Due to the potential for abuse, demotion requests which are seen to bully other users may be closed without warning.
  • A user will be demoted without a formal proposal if they are inactive for one year or longer.
  • Format your title such as Username (Rank) replacing username and rank with the appropriate information.
Right Powers Edit requirement Active membership Other requirements Available
Discussions moderator Edit, lock, and delete posts 200 discussion posts 1 month N/A No
Rollback/Patroller One-click undo button and ability to flag edits as patrolled, and also ability to rename files 400 mainspace 1 month N/A Yes
Content moderator Rights from rollback/patrollers, deleting pages, protecting pages 600 mainspace 1 month N/A Yes
Administrator All of the above, blocking users, editing highly technical aspects of the wiki 1,000 mainspace 2 months N/A No
Bureaucrat Give administrator and bureaucrat rights to other users N/A N/A Chosen by existing bureaucrats No

Promotions

Demotions

Astralhan (Autoconfirmed users)

Astralhan (talkcontributionsedit count)

I think she needs to be demoted because she has not been active for 6 months and is not working on her position. Kalina Message me! PIkachu angry 19:47, April 17 2021 (CET)

Support Support: As someone who has make a request on demotions, I agree. Ellis99 CODE XANA 17:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Support: But only with regards to Discuss Moderator rights, because frankly removing autoconfirmed rights isn't a good idea, imo. Qwertyxp2000 II (talk | contribs) 00:18, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Support: ^^Agreed, but they mean demote them down to autoconfirmed users. | ~The legendary cube: TimeCube Message Me! 15:15, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Taliseth, BlueeCookie, Benna96 and MangoBM (Autoconfirmed users)

Taliseth (talkcontributionsedit count)
BlueeCookie (talkcontributionsedit count)
Benna96 (talkcontributionsedit count)
MangoBM (talkcontributionsedit count)

I may not be a very active user here, but I believe that if a user hasn't been on in more than six months, they should be demoted. If they come back and become active again, I think they should be promoted back to their old position. Ellis99 CODE XANA 17:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment Comment: Just to clarify, are the positions above just listing the ones they are currently in? Or what they should be demoted to? If it's just listing the ones the users are currently in, I'm pretty sure it should say (Autoconfirmed users) | ~The legendary cube: TimeCube Message Me! 18:46, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment Comment: These are the positions they currently are. If we used "Autoconfirmed users" instead of their title rights, then feel free to change it to that :) Ellis99 CODE XANA 20:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment Comment: a year of inactivity is grounds for demotion here iirc - Sherb3 JowaPlays | Message Wall Trole 21:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment Comment: Jowa you are right at least that's what I think Emilysara enforced when she was an administrator. | ~The legendary cube: TimeCube Message Me! 21:49, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment Comment: Who can demote bureaucrats? Maxlefkoff (talk) 16:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment Comment: Not sure. Maybe other bureaucrats? I'm not sure. | ~The legendary cube: TimeCube Message Me! 22:07, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment Comment: Rather bureaucrats. Kalina Message me! PIkachu angry 13:14, 19 April 2021 (CET)
Comment Comment: we'd have to get into contact with fandom to remove bureaucratic status but it honestly isn't worth the trouble - Sherb3 JowaPlays | Message Wall Trole 23:12, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment Comment: Ursuul would probably do it. Ellis99 CODE XANA 12:33, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Oppose Oppose Demoting Taliseth: I oppose demoting Taliseth, mainly because technically Tali did edit roughly a month ago, but if he continues to be inactive, I wouldn't be opposed to reaching out to FANDOM staff. | ~The legendary cube: TimeCube Message Me! 14:09, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Neutral Neutral About Demoting BlueeCookie: It's always tough for me when it comes to demoting administrators. Since BlueCookie hasn't said anything since July 2020, I'd wait until the next July since 1 year of inactivity is grounds for demoting a user. | ~The legendary cube: TimeCube Message Me! 14:09, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Support Support Demoting Benna96 and MangoBM: I haven't seen either rollback/patroller active ever since I joined the wiki in August. It would make sense if they did get their rights granted back (maybe even as content moderators) if they come back, as from what I hear they were very contributive. | ~The legendary cube: TimeCube Message Me! 14:09, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment Comment: Shouldn't the rule of being inactive for more than a year be made more clearer than it is currently? Ellis99 CODE XANA 17:24, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


Voting
ProposalsRights
Advertisement